Fri 23 Jan 2009
The earthquake Microsoft created in the BI world
Posted by Oudi Antebi under On-Premise BI[6] Comments
I know that any reader of this post will keep thinking about the fact that Panorama has a “coopetition†relationship with Microsoft, on one hand we partner closely to extend their BI platform and on the other we compete on the BI applications.… That is true, and I won’t lie, I think the discontinuity of PerformancePoint Server as a standalone BI product has a MAJOR positive impact on Panorama, but in this post I want to give my analysis on what this actually means for the world of BI and more specifically Microsoft’s future BI strategy.
First, some facts:
- In 2006, Microsoft picked a strategy to build a dedicated BI product called PerformancePoint Server. The idea was that MSFT will compete with pure play BI vendors such as Panorama, Cognos and others with a complete BI strategy.
- PPS (PerformancePoint Server) included 3 modules, BPF (Budgeting, planning and forecasting), Analytics and Scorecarding.
- Microsoft wanted to make PPS server the “ultimate BI Application suite for the enterprise†by investing in future versions that will focus on making BI better and more competitive when compared with other pure play products.
- The analytics solution in PPS was entirely based on the Proclarity product acquired in April 2006.
What did Microsoft announce today?
- Microsoft will not have a future version of PerformancePoint Server
- Meaning Microsoft has given up on its vision to have a dedicated BI product that will compete with pure play providers.
- Microsoft will not build anymore Budgeting, planning and forecasting solutions and customers will have to rip and replace with other 3rd party products
- There is not going to be any Proclarity product any longer (some Proclarity employees were let go yesterday)
- Scorecard and analytics features will now be developed in SharePoint and branded PerformancePoint Services
What does all this mean?
- Microsoft PerformancePoint Server was NOT a successful product otherwise Microsoft would have not stopped investing in it.
- Microsoft gave up the ambition to be a pure-play competitor for BI application products and instead has decided to add more value to its core Office products, by adding the BI features to them (which is not the same as a full blown BI solution)
- This means that Office users will be able to do SOME analysis and SOME scorecarding but not expect to get the full BI functionality that can replace products from companies like Panorama, Business Objects or Cognos
- Microsoft is going back to the roots of being a platform provider (SQL Server as a leading BI platform with new innovations on that side)
Why won’t SharePoint be a great alternative for pure-play BI products?
- There is a major difference between a “dedicated product†that has a team and a budget to take the product forward vs. a product that has many different features in different areas and all “compete†on mindshare and investment.
- On the current upcoming version of SharePoint as well as future versions, BI feature have to “compete†on resources vs. investments in search, collaboration, workflow and portal features which have a higher demand in the market.
- This means that the amount of BI functionality and pace of innovation will much more limited.
- Microsoft basically decided to combine the products TO SAVE COSTS and fired many from the BI team, this means LESS investment in BI when compared to last year and will result in LESS BI capabilities from MSFT.
What should you do and expect in the future:
- First and foremost, BI now will be part of Office 14. So whether or not you will like the features of MSFT BI in SharePoint and Office you will have to upgrade to the new stack.
- For those that do go through the upgrade, they can expect to get some good value from SharePoint and Office for BI if looking for BASIC and departmental BI features that can be used lightly in the organization.
- For companies or ISVs that are OK developing their own BI solution SharePoint, as well as other MS products like Visio, Excel, Reporting services are a great toolset to use to build a custom solution
- For customers who are looking for a full enterprise BI solution, Microsoft WILL NOT be a good solution. As such a solution needs to have a dedicated focus, which MSFT just gave up on!
- Customers that invested in the MSFT BI PLATFORM (SQL) should stick to it as it is by far the most powerful and capable BI platform today
- Customers should now look at 3rd party solutions like ours to ensure they chose the best product that has the lowest TCO and the fastest ROI and “time to productionâ€, that can work best on top of the existing platform investments.
- Customers of Proclarity should look for companies that can migrate them to a new solution in the cheapest way (Warning… Advertising…. Panorama does that).
Would love to hear you thoughts.
Check us up on http://twitter.com/panoramaSW
Follow me on http://twitter.com/oudiantebi









January 23rd, 2009 at 6:10 pm
in a single word: stunned.
we started this year on a high note, project deals closed and order book almost full for the entire year, including a couple of seriously large Planning/Consolidation projects, all PPS, all Planning. And now? All the hours spent in POC and presale activities last part of 2008? wasted.
January 23rd, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Hi Oudi, although always a tough competitor and most of the time I did disagree….. I can only agree that todays announcement is a challenge for many but an opprotunity for some. Panorama being one of them!
January 26th, 2009 at 10:58 am
[...] http://www.panorama.com/blog/?p=129 Posted in Microsoft. Tags: Performance Point Server. [...]
January 27th, 2009 at 5:50 am
Not so happy from a professional’s point of view. I invested time and money to become familiar with the product and studied a fair bit to sit the exam. Doing so seemed a good decision at the time, but I’m not so sure now.
January 29th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
I read this article & don’t agree with it. I still believe MS provide a perfect BI platform. Their PPS product was in market for an year and it’s planning, budgeting & forecasting was not good. So they decided to get away with Planning part & integrate the Monitoring & Analytics with MOSS.
For any BI implementation you need
1. Database: MS offers sql server 2005/2008.
2. ETL: MS Offers SSIS.
3. Reporting: MS offers SSRS
4. Cube: MS offers SSAS
5. Dashboard visual: Monitoring part of PPS & now will be integrated with MOSS.
6. Analytics visual : MS offers ProClarity earlier part of PPS now is MOSS.
Microsoft offers first four as part of Sql server license. Lot of clients use this platform to implement their BI & it needs development. I believe it will cost less money to implement MS BI solution as compare to buying a solution from other vendor.
What are the alternatives if not Microsoft?
There are lot of vendors who sells BI product the major players are Microstrategy,Congnos(IBM),Business Objects(SAP),Panorama and lot others.
These product are very costly itself plus you have to buy a database(sql,oracle etc..) and then customization & implementation cost.
I still believe there will be lot of custom BI development on MS platform.
January 30th, 2009 at 9:34 am
Ranjay,
Thank you for the feedback, I addressed your point in a new blog post: http://www.panorama.com/blog/?p=132
Would love to hear your thoughts!